AlaskaDave's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 46519875 | Done. |
|
| 46519875 | Yep, you're right. I used a list from the USFWS website and didn't bother to clean up the old tagging. It's on my todo list. |
|
| 42930943 | This changeset actually included many edits to the streets in Dillingham. Reworked and relocated, simplified horrible existing Tiger data. This is a work in progress. I saved it but forgot to change the comment to reflect what was done. |
|
| 31699927 | Hi sandhill,
|
|
| 33363018 | No problem. I was looking for a way to record the name of this historical junction and came up with highway=junction, admittedly a bad idea. The two ways no longer cross - consequently there is no longer a junction - 1317 now crosses 11 on bridges. I'll just leave its name on the area and remove the junction tag. |
|
| 26248111 | Sounds good. |
|
| 26248111 | I don't know. I merely moved an existing reservoir to where I thought it might be when more water is present. I think the reservoir you tagged is probably the actual location. I think the original reservoir should be deleted. By the way, are you sure the name is spelled Meatian? I think it is Mae Tian, but I'll look for my photo to double check. |
|
| 27389799 | This comment is from the one I saved previously. It should read: Adding some POIs in my neighborhood of Chang Phuak. source=Bing, survey, GPS |
|
| 27170191 | I agree with the previous comment. I am aware that highway 101 is being upgraded and perhaps deserves the reclassification but there is more to it than that. Reclassifying the links, making sure bridges also get the changed ref number and classification is part of the process. Such "loose ends" have to be dealt with. |