Hello there, I have partially reverted some elements of this changeset, in changeset/145554430. I appreciate the additions of buildings and driveways to the area, but please stop adding things that pretty clearly do not exist. Thanks!

I'm pretty sure this is just Evpac back at it again with more egregiously bad edits. It seems like there's still a few things that need to be reverted I'll do that when I have time but this is exhausting. Has this guy been reported yet?

Thanks for all the excellent work you've been doing on the Tsuut'ina Nation. It's looking great :)

Agree with the above comment. and next time maybe don't go all the way across the province editing random stuff making these huge changeset boxes. I've tried messaging you, comment on your stuff, you don't respond to anything.

I have some questions about this tagging. Since this is technically a highway exit shouldn't it be tagged as "motorway_link"? It's connecting Stoney Tr with highway 8, but the rest of Stoney trail hasn't yet opened. Also, from what I've seen, the ref numbers don't get tagged on the motorway links themselves? since the destination:ref tag is already on there it basically makes it redundant. I might be wrong though, because this section of Stoney Trail is also considered highway 8. Also, I just drove this yesterday and currently the speed limit is 60 so I'll go correct that

I have already had issues with this user making incorrect changesets and they never responded to my comments or concerns. Very frustrating.

Hi, I noticed you made some suspicious looking edits and added some things that do not exist. I understand that maybe you are inexperienced but please do not add in tunnels and roads unless you confirm that they exist from the ground. Many aerial imagery might not be up to date and could contain incorrect information. Please also put more of a description so people know what you are doing. Thanks :)

This is vandalism.

Hello! Just for future reference, when tagging exit "names", use the "destination=" tag on the exit way, instead of putting the "name=" tag on the motorway_junction node. I have gone back and fixed that for you in changeset #141994423. You can also look at the OpenStreetMap wiki page for "Tag:highway=motorway_junction" for more information on how to map that. Anyway, Cheers to the opening of the ring road! Have a great day :)

Is this correct mapping practice? This is a 2-storey parking garage, so I had previously marked two roads with the above ones tagged as layer=1. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to merge both upper floor and lower floor into a single way. At least, that's what I understood from the wiki. Cheers

awesome changeset number :D

encountered this after coming across an out of place bilingual road in Calgary and went in to correct it. Weird edits from this person

alright, changeset #120104531 has it now changed to what it was before. I left the main tags (landuse=grass, leisure=dog_park, operator name) on the site relation along with the name, but also added those three tags to each way. should be correct now.

they are pretty much identical in the real world, but that's a good point so I will change it back. Thanks

okay, see changeset #120074711 for the change. Changed it from site relation to a multipolygon, and transferred the tags into the relation itself including the dog park one . Should be good to go

The relation is not tagged this way, but each individual section has been. I will go and change it from site to multipolygon so I can tag it properly.

cool changeset number!